2009 PISA Test Results for Chile: A Time to Celebrate or a Time to Mourn?

Reflections on the 2009 PISA Test Results for Chile

The OECD’s latest PISA Survey tests reading, mathematics and science performance by students in 65 economies worldwide. Aside from global rankings, the report discusses which educational systems are offering students the best training for entering the workforce of tomorrow, and why.

What is PISA and what does it tell us?

PISA is an innovative test instrument that measures the quality of learning outcomes, equity in the distribution of learning opportunities, value for money, and what place your country is in when compared to other countries in the OECD.

For example, Chile is number 44 in the world, but number 1 in Latin America. Is this cause for national celebration? Is this cause for national mourning? The answer to that question depends principally on what perspective you are viewing these results from.

To better understand the results, let’s rephrase the question. Can any country in today’s globalized world be content after finishing number 44? In Chile, the answer to that question is “No”. The country is taking steps designed to improve the quality of education. Number 44 in the world (1 in Latin America) is not considered to be, “good enough”.

Why not? Test results revealed that 1 out of every 3 Chilean students still do not understand what they read. That means somebody’s child is failing. That means a bright, shining socioeconomic future for 2 students and a dim, disadvantaged socioeconomic future for the other student. Most people would agree that this situation, inequity in future aspirations, future dreams, future hopes, future quality of life, is unacceptable.

The characteristic that the best performing education systems have in common is that they refuse to accept failure. Put another way, would you accept that your child could not understand what s/he reads? Not!

"I Lost The Game": The Best Education Systems Do Not Accept Failure

How does PISA test students?

15-year-old students are tested on whether they can extrapolate what they know. They are asked to apply knowledge to solve problems. Rote memory, or learning by heart, is not sufficient to make a good mark on this test.

If we refer to Bloom’s Taxonomy, rote memory is associated with the lowest order thinking skills, while applied knowledge represents a higher order thinking skill. Most people nowadays would accept that the world of the future will require our students to solve problems they have never encountered before. This means using what you know, collaboratively, to be successful.

What countries did well on PISA 2009?

China was number 1 in the world. Yes, China is now better than Finland. China scored 556 points while Finland dropped back to number 3. Finland scored 536 points. Finland’s methodology was known to everyone: High-quality teachers (Masters degree), high status, high prestige for teachers, high pay for teachers, small class size, high quality social services for children, and a society that highly values reading, among others. In sum, the Finnish system believes that, “No education system can be better than the quality of its teachers”.

However, what is China’s secret? I imagine that the world will be examining the Chinese pretty closely in the months and years to come, trying to answer that question. There are huge differences between China and Finland, and quite frankly, some interesting insights are sure to be valuable to those who are capable of discovering strategies which can be successfully replicated.

One fascinating result continues to haunt every single country, all 65, who were tested. Namely, in all 65 nations tested, girls read better than boys. In fact, this has been true of every PISA test from 2000 to 2010. Whoever can find the answer to this puzzle, and then apply the solution effectively, will surely earn a Nobel prize. The problem of boys underperformance in reading has long taken on mythic proportions…

To conclude, PISA has provided Chile with many reasons to be proud of our past efforts in education. Nonetheless, it is clear to everyone that we can only be satisfied when all of Chile’s sons and daughters can understand what they are reading, can apply what they have learned to solve novel problems, and are prepared for the scientific and technological world of the future. Their future, and indeed, Chile’s future, will depend on having a high quality education system, for all of Chile’s children…

Thomas Baker
Teacher of English
Santiago, Chile

About these ads

About profesorbaker

Thomas Baker is the Past-President of TESOL Chile (2010-2011). He is the Coordinator of the English Department at Colegio Internacional SEK in Santiago, Chile. He is the Co-Founder and Co-Organiser of EdCamp Santiago 2012 & Edcamp Chile 2013, free, participant-driven, democratic, conversation based professional development for teachers, by teachers. EdCamp Santiago 2012 was held at Universidad Mayor in Santiago. Edcamp Chile 2013 was held at Universidad UCINF. Thomas is also a member of the Advisory Board for the International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Association (HETL), where he also serves as a reviewer and as the HETL Ambassador for Chile. Thomas enjoys writing about a wide variety of topics. Thus far, he has written the following genres: romance, historical fiction, autobiographical, sports history/biography, and English Language Teaching. He has published a total of sixty one (61) books, all available on Amazon http://amzn.to/Qxmoec . The source and inspiration for his writing comes from his family, his wife Gabriela, and his son, Thomas Jerome Baker, Jr.
This entry was posted in Educación, Global, Pedagogía and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 2009 PISA Test Results for Chile: A Time to Celebrate or a Time to Mourn?

  1. Amos Cruz says:

    I was trying to trace Chile’s academic achievement and found the results to be interesting, highlighting both “sides of the coin” that is Chile’s performance.

    I was looking back at other multi-national tests, in particular the TIMSS 1999, 2003, and 2007 put out by IEA. At a quick glance, I observed that Chile’s results for mathematics dropped slightly between 1999 and 2003. When I looked through the 2007 document, Chile was no where to be found.

    Would you happen to know why Chile didn’t participate in the TIMSS 2007 testing?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s